SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Amir Education Society – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Public School Society – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. The present Letters Patent Appeal is arising out of the order dated 01.04.2009 passed in W.P.(C.) No.12991/2018 as well as the order dated 15.12.2021 passed in Review Petition No.205/2021, The Amir Education Society Vs. The Delhi Public School Society.

2. The facts of the case reveal that the appellant before this Court/The Amir Education Society is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. It was registered on 05.08.2004 and the society is running Modern Delhi Public School located in Sector 87, Faridabad. The petitioner society has stated in the LPA is running the school for the last 18 years and provides all modern amenities to the students. The respondent/The Delhi Public School Society is again a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 is running numerous schools under the name and style of Delhi Public School.

(i) A dispute arose between the appellant and the respondent in respect of the trademark Delhi Public School and C.S.(O.S.) No.733/2006 was filed before the Delhi High Court against the appellant for permanent and mandatory injunction and rending of accounts and damages. However, the pla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top