Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Satish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Krishna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the suit case. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on maintainability of suit. (Para 6 , 11) |
| 3. court's analysis of court fees. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. review application and its dismissal. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. rejections of additional issue framing. (Para 18 , 22 , 24) |
| 6. conclusion dismissing the petition. (Para 27 , 29 , 30) |
1. The order dated 21st February, 2022, passed by learned Additional Senior Civil Judge (the learned ASCJ) in CS SCJ 815/18 (Krishna v. Satish Kumar) decides three applications filed by the petitioner, as the defendant in the said suit. They were filed under Section 21(2), Order XIV Rule 5 and Order XIX Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the CPC).
The suit
2. CS CSJ 815/18 was filed by the respondents against, inter alia, the petitioner. The petitioner was Defendant 1 in the suit. Defendant 2 Angoori Devi expired during the pendency of the proceedings. The respondents were the plaintiffs in the suit.
3. The respondents, in the suit, claimed to have become absolute owners of a property situated at D-4/15, Plot No. 24, Khasra No. 24/6 & 24/7, Village Dabri, Delhi (the suit property) by virtue of a registered
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
