SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Akash Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Flipkart Internet Private Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

CS (COMM) 492/2022

1. Let the Plaint be registered as a suit.

2. Issue summons to the Defendants through all modes upon filing of Process Fee. Summons is accepted by Mr. Sidharth Chopra, on behalf of Defendant No.1-Flipkart.

3. A written statement to the Plaint shall be positively filed within 30 days. Along with the written statement, the Defendant No.1 shall also file an affidavit of admission/denial of the documents of the Plaintiff, without which the written statement shall not be taken on record.

4. Liberty is given to the Plaintiff to file a replication within 15 days of the receipt of the written statement(s). Along with the replication, if any, filed by the Plaintiff, an affidavit of admission/denial of documents of the Defendant No.1, be filed by the Plaintiff, without which the replication shall not be taken on record. If any of the parties wish to seek inspection of any documents, the same shall be sought and given within the timelines.

5. List on 26th September, 2022, before the Joint Registrar for marking of exhibits. It is made clear that any party unjustifiably denying documents would be liable to be burdened with costs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top