SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MINI PUSHKARNA
Royal Orchids – Appellant
Versus
Kulbir Singh Kohli – Respondent


Table of Content
1. arbitration petition and mou context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. petitioner's claim of breach and readiness to perform. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12)
3. respondent's counterarguments regarding mou nature. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 18)
4. petitioner's rebuttal on contract nature. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 25)
5. court's analysis of mou clauses and implications. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 34)
6. court's decision based on statutory provisions. (Para 35 , 36)
7. conclusion and dismissal of the petition. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)

JUDGMENT

Mini Pushkarna, J. The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called as "Act"), against the respondents seeking urgent interim orders for protection to preserve the subject matter of arbitration i.e. property bearing no. K-1, Basaidarapur, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi.

2. As per the petitioner, the parties entered into a MOU dated 03.03.2022, in terms of which the property had to be developed by the petitioner at its own cost in lieu of being paid 30% of the sale proceeds. The petitioner paid an advance sum of Rs.1 crore to the respondents and the remaining

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top