SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Bolt Technology Ou – Appellant
Versus
Ujoy Technology Private Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

I.As.13531/2022, 13532/2022 (for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. I.A.13531/2022 and I.A.13532/2022 are disposed of.

I.A.13530/2022 (u/S 12A of CCA)

3. This is an application filed on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking exemption from instituting pre-litigation mediation, in accordance with Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter, "CCA").

4. The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff - Bolt Technology OU seeking permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, passing off of trademark, infringement of copyright, unfair competition, rendition of accounts, damages, and other reliefs. The Plaintiff claims to be the registered proprietor of the mark `BOLT' used in relation to ride-hailing, food and grocery delivery, rental of cars, e-bikes and scooters, Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations/docks, worldwide. The Plaintiff has obtained various registrations for the mark `BOLT' in several jurisdictions and the details of the same are set out in the Plaint. It is the case of the Plaintiff that the Defendants are using the identical mark `BOLT', alo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top