IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ARIJIT BANERJEE, RAI CHATTOPADHYAY
Pankaj Plastic Industries Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Anita Anu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Arijit Banerjee, J.
1. By consent of the parties, the appeal and the connected application were taken up for hearing together.
2. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated May 6, 2025, whereby the defendant’s application for revocation of leave granted under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, being GA-COM 6 of 2025, was allowed by a learned Judge of this Court. Consequently, the suit stood dismissed and the interim order passed in the suit stood vacated.
Submission of the appellant
3. The appellant / plaintiff is, inter alia, engaged in the manufacture and sale of plastic pipes, machines and machine tools, under the mark ‘Pankaj Flex’ and other trademarks i.e., ‘Pankaj Flexy’ and ‘Pankaj’ which have been assigned to the plaintiff. Alleging that the defendant is selling similar products under a deceptively similar trademark, i.e., ‘Poly Punkaj’, thereby creating confusion as regards the source of the goods, the appellant filed the instant suit for infringement of trademark and passing off.
4. In the plaint, the appellant sought for dispensation of pre-suit mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (in short ‘the CC Act’), on th
Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Keerthi
Bengal Waterproof Ltd. V. Bombay Waterproof Mfg. Co. and Anr
Mary Pushpam v. Telvi Curusunary & Ors.
Jagvir Singh & Ors. v. State (Delhi Admn.
Patil Automation Private Limited and Another v. Rakheja Engineers Private Limited
Under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, pre-suit mediation is mandatory, and merely claiming urgency is insufficient without demonstrable evidence in the pleadings.
The requirement of pre-institution mediation under Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is mandatory unless urgent interim relief is demonstrated, which must be assessed from the plaintiff....
The court ruled that Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act applies to intellectual property suits, emphasizing that delay in filing does not negate urgency for interim relief.
Rejection of plaint – When Plaint is filed with a prayer for urgent interim relief, Commercial Courts should examine nature and subject matter of suit, cause of action and prayer for interim relief.
Rejection of plaint – Commercial suit which does not contemplate any urgent relief under Commercial Courts Act shall not be instituted unless plaintiff exhausts remedy of Pre-Institution Mediation.
Section 12A of the CC Act mandates pre-litigation mediation, and claims for urgent relief must meet specific criteria to bypass this requirement.
A plaintiff in a trademark infringement suit may bypass pre-institution mediation if the suit contemplates urgent interim relief, as mandated by Section 12A of The Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Mandatory compliance with Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 for suits not contemplating urgent interim relief, and the prevention of deceptive invocation of urgent relief to circumvent t....
Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act requires pre-institution mediation for suits not seeking urgent relief, establishing a mandatory procedural framework.
A plaintiff may be exempt from mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act when seeking urgent interim relief in ongoing infringement cases, despite any filing....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.