Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Cross Fit LLC – Appellant
Versus
RTB Gym and Fitness Centre – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's ownership and use of the trademark 'crossfit' (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. procedural history and initial court orders (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. grants of permanent injunction and summary of reliefs (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. contempt of court consideration and implications (Para 13 , 14 , 19 , 22) |
| 5. consequences of the defendant's non-compliance (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. appointment of local commissioner for compliance (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, dilution and tarnishment of trademark, unfair competition, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up, and other reliefs. The Plaintiff claims to be the proprietor of the registered trademark `CROSSFIT' used in respect of services in the health, fitness and nutrition sector. The details of the Plaintiff's registrations in respect of the mark `CROSSFIT' are set out below:
3. The Plaintiff is a company based out of California, USA incorporated under the name CrossFit Inc., in the year 2004. Ther
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
