SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA, MINI PUSHKARNA
State – Appellant
Versus
Rahul – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mini Pushkarna, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved with the impugned judgment dated 20.10.2011 passed by learned ASJ/Special Judge (NDPS) (West Delhi) in Sessions Case No.47/2010, arising out of FIR No.45/2010 under Sections 376/377 IPC registered at Police Station - Nabi Karim, the present appeal has been filed on behalf of the State. By way of the impugned judgment, the Sessions Court has acquitted the accused/respondent by granting him benefit of doubt by holding that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond any reasonable doubt.

2. As per the case of the prosecution, on 22.04.2010, at about 2.00 PM, the victim while returning from school wanted to ease herself and had gone to the public toilet situated at Multani Danda, Paharganj, Gali No.6. The accused followed her and forcibly took her to male toilet, where he removed her underwear and frock (top) and made her to lay down on the floor and committed rape upon her. The accused put his hand on the mouth of the victim and did not allow her to scream. In the meantime, one lady, PW9 heard the noise from the male toilet. She came to the male toilet and saw the accused being held by one `K', who was known to PW9, being a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top