IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Navin Chawla, J.
Western Digital Technologies Inc. - Appellant
Versus
Raaj Computer - Respondent
CS(COMM) 677 of 2019 & IAs 17475-76 of 2019
Decided On : 21-09-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's trademark ownership and use (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. evidence of trademark infringement (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. court's interim actions and findings (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. court's reasoning on trademark protection (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. doctrine of exhaustion and product tampering (Para 26 , 27) |
| 6. infringement proven, injunctive relief granted (Para 28 , 29) |
| 7. damages awarded due to defendant's inaction (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. final decree of the suit (Para 34) |
JUDGMENT
1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking inter alia a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its proprietor, partners, representatives and/or others acting for and on its behalf from selling, offering for sale, advertising or otherwise dealing in infringing goods which bear the plaintiff's registered trade marks "WESTERN DIGITAL",
and/or "WD" (hereinafter referred to as "Western Digital trade marks")
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
2. It is the case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff-company was founded in April 1970 as `General Digital', and in July 1971, it adopted its current name and trade mark "WESTERN DIGITAL" as part of its corporate name. The plaintiff, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Digital Corporation, is one of the largest computer hard-disk drive manufacturers in the world.
3. The plaintiff is a world-renowned manufacturer and marketer of inter alia storage devices, media players, routers/switches/bridges, comprising of Original Equipment Manufacturer (in short, `OEM')/system manufacturer, desktop, and enterprise, solid state drives (in short `SSDs'), software and mobile applications which are marketed and sold under the plaintiff's "Western Digital trade marks".
4. "WESTERN DIGITAL" is the most essential feature of the plaintiff's corporate name, and is also used as a trade mark by the plaintiff-company, either as a standalone or as a conjunctive
mark. The plaintiff's "WD" logo, is which is its corporate logo, is present on all the labels and packaging of their goods.
5. The plaintiff has applied for and is the registered proprietor of the "Western Digital trade marks" in India. The details of trade mark registrations granted in favour of the plaintiff in Class 5 under the provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") are as follows:
| Trade Mark | Number | Class | Date | Goods |
| WESTERN DIGITAL | 1345682 | 9 | March 18, 2005 | COMPUTER PRODUCTS, NAMELY, DISK DRIVES |
| WD | 1349235 | 9 | April 6, 2005 | COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INCLUDING, HARD DRIVES |
![]() | 1325732 | 9 | December 14, 2004 | COMPUTER PRODUCTS, NAMELY HARD DRIVES |
6. The plaintiff also owns and maintains several websites whose domain names contain "WESTERN DIGITAL" or "WD" and are used for marketing and selling goods bearing the "Western Digital trade marks", the details whereof are given in paragraph 12 of the plaint.
7. The plaintiff submits that the Western Digital trade marks have been registered in many countries such as Australia, China, Singapore, Canada, the European Union, France, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Russia, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United States of America and the United Arab Emirates, to name a few. The plaintiff has provided details of the revenue earned by the plaintiff-company, up until the filing of the present suit, in paragraph 15 of the plaint.
8. The plaintiff further states that it has invested large sums of money in advertising and promoting the goods bearing the "Western Digital trade marks" world-wide as well as in India. Since the year 2005, the plaintiff has spent more than Rs.20 Crore to build the "WESTERN DIGITAL" and "WD" brands in India.
9. The plaintiff further asserts that they have been extensively advertised in all major international magazines including `Wired', `Rolling Stone', `Fast Company', `PC Adviser', `PC Pro', `Computer Shopper, and `The Gadget Show Magazine', to name only a few. All these magazines are widely circulated and re
Trademark owners can prevent unauthorized sales of altered goods bearing their marks, affirming the right to trade mark integrity and consumer protection.
Trademark infringement occurs when identical trademarks are used on counterfeit goods, leading to public confusion and deception.
The judgment establishes the application of summary judgment in cases where a party lacks substantive defense and the evidence supports the claim of infringement.
The court established that the sale of counterfeit medical devices constitutes a grave offense endangering public health, warranting both compensatory and exemplary damages.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the plaintiff to a permanent injunction for passing off its mark 'SANDHI SUDHA' and the consideration of the defendants' non-rep....
The impugned marks are deceptively similar to Plaintiff's registered marks, leading to public deception, and the Court passes a summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiff.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the infringement of a registered trademark under the Trademarks Act, 1999, and the entitlement to a permanent injunction and damages for the vio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.