SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Western Digital Technologies Inc. – Appellant
Versus
Raaj Computer – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff's trademark ownership and use (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. evidence of trademark infringement (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. court's interim actions and findings (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
4. court's reasoning on trademark protection (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
5. doctrine of exhaustion and product tampering (Para 26 , 27)
6. infringement proven, injunctive relief granted (Para 28 , 29)
7. damages awarded due to defendant's inaction (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
8. final decree of the suit (Para 34)

JUDGMENT

1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking inter alia a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its proprietor, partners, representatives and/or others acting for and on its behalf from selling, offering for sale, advertising or otherwise dealing in infringing goods which bear the plaintiff's registered trade marks "WESTERN DIGITAL", and/or "WD" (hereinafter referred to as "Western Digital trade marks")

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2. It is the case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff-company was founded in April 1970 as `General Digital', and in July 1971, it adopted its current name and trade mark "WESTERN

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top