SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Unilever Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The appellant (hereafter `Reckitt') has filed the present intra court appeal impugning a judgement dated 09.11.2021 (hereafter `the impugned judgement') passed by the learned Single Judge in an application preferred by Reckitt under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter `CPC') in the suit bearing no. CS(COMM.) 340/2021. Reckitt is aggrieved to the limited extent that the learned Sigle Judge has rejected its prayer for restraining the respondent (hereafter `HUL') from broadcasting a TV Commercial (hereafter `the impugned TVC-I') which according to Reckitt was disparaging its product sold under the trademark `HARPIC', during the pendency of the suit.

Factual Context

2. Reckitt (Reckitt Benckiser India Private Limited) is a company engaged in the manufacturing, packaging, sale and distribution of various fast moving consumer goods. Reckitt's business comprises of various consumer and healthcare products including antiseptic liquid, toilet care products, surface care products, pharmaceuticals, insecticides and food products.

3. Reckitt states that it has been involved in the manufacturing of a well-known toilet cleaner un







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top