Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
GAURANG KANTH
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Leelawati – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Gaurang Kanth, J. The present appeal has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Award dated 12.12.2013 ("impugned Award") passed by the Court of learned Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dwarka Courts, Delhi in MACP No. 126/2012.
2. By way of the impugned Award dated 12.12.2013 the learned Claims Tribunal Awarded a compensation of Rs.9,79,272/- with interest @ 7.5 % per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount and directed the Insurance Company to deposit the entire awarded amount before the learned Claims Tribunal within a period of one month.
SUBMISSION OF THE APPELLANT
3. Mr. Pankaj Seth, learned counsel for the Appellant contended that learned Claims Tribunal erred in observing that the alleged incident took place due to negligent driving of the offending vehicle. He further contended that it is a settled law that when two vehicles are involved in an accident then the act has to be treated as contributory negligence. He further contended that in terms of dicta of Hon'ble Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Pranay Sethi & Ors. reported as (20
Negligence in motor accident cases is established primarily by evidence; contributory negligence must be substantiated. Enhanced compensation granted based on established income and future prospects ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of contributory negligence and the calculation of just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the applicability of the Supreme Court judgment in National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Pranay Sethi & Ors. and the proper calculation of compensation ba....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of compensation in cases of negligence and contributory negligence under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, based on factors such as l....
The court established that compensation for motor vehicle accidents must be just and can be enhanced even without cross-objections from claimants, following the multiplier method.
The court affirmed the application of the multiplier method for calculating compensation in motor vehicle accident cases, ensuring just compensation for dependents.
The court applied the Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1998 to determine the compensation, including income, future prospects, and conventional heads, and upheld the interest and manner of payment....
The court established that insurers can be held liable to pay compensation even if the driver lacks a valid license, following the 'pay and recover' principle.
Point of Law : In death cases, compensation would be awarded only under three conventional heads, viz – loss of estate, loss of consortium and funeral expenses.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
