IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
Sumant Investments Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - Respondent
W.P.(C) 12618 of 2022 and CM Appl. 38229 of 2022 (for stay)
Decided On : 28-09-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges order under income tax act (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's argument on non-existence of company (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. acknowledgment of non-existence by respondent (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. setting aside invalid notice and order (Para 8) |
| 5. disposition of writ petition (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the Order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act') and the Notice issued under Section 148 of the Act, both dated 20th July, 2022 for the Assessment Year (`AY') 2014-15.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the impugned Order and notice are void ab initio as the same have been issued in the name of Sare Marketing Private Limited which was amalgamated with the Petitioner Company i.e. Sumant Investments Private Ltd. w.e.f. 1st April, 2014 vide order of this Court dated 19th September, 2014 under Section 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 and accordingly, the company, namely, Sare Marketing Private Limited has not been in existence since then.
3. He states that the Petitioner informed the Respondent about the status of the assessee vide several replies filed in response to notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act'). He, however, states that the Respondent without taking cognizance of replies of the petitioner, proceeded to pass the impugned order under Section 148A(d) in the name of Sare Marketing Private Limited. He also emphasises that on 9th February, 2016, the Assessing Officer had passed an assessment order with regard to the erstwhile company for the Assessment Year 2013-14, after taking into account the factum of amalgamation of Sare Marketing Private Limited with the petitioner company.
4. He submits that the notice being in the name of a non-existent company cannot be complied with and accordingly, the petitioner company cannot file return in response to notice under Section 148 of the Act in the name of Sare Marketing Private Limited with reference to PAN of above company.
5. Issue notice.
6. Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue accepts notice.
7. He states that he has received following instructions from the Assessing Officer vide e-mail dated 23rd September, 2022.
"After taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case it is noticed that notice u/s 148 was issued in this case in the name of M/s Sare Marketing P. Ltd. for the A.Y. 2014-15. Further, perusal of records revealed that this entity was merged with M/s. Sumant Investments Pvt. Ltd. w.e.f. 01.04.2014 vide Hon'ble Delhi High Court's order dated 19.09.2014. Therefore, it is on records that the entity M/s Sare Marketing Pvt. Ltd. was not in existence on the date of issue of notices u/s 148A(b) and u/s 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
8. In view of the aforesaid facts and the stand taken by the respondent the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the Notice issued under Section 148 of the Act, both dated 20th July, 2022 for the Assessment Year 2014-15 are set aside. If the law permits the respondents/revenue to take further steps in the matter, they shall adbe at liberty to do so. Needless to state that if and when such steps are taken and if the petitioners have a grievance, they shall be at liberty to take their remedies in accordance with law.
9. Accordingly, the present writ petition and the application stand disposed of.
Notices issued under the Income Tax Act to non-existent entities due to amalgamation are void ab initio and unenforceable.
A notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is invalid if issued against a non-existent entity, confirming the need for valid recognition of a company's status post-amalgamation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act in the name of a non-existent entity, which has undergone a scheme of amalgamation and....
Notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act cannot be issued to a non-existent entity following an amalgamation, as such actions lack legal jurisdiction.
The impugned notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the name of a non-existing company due to amalgamation is not tenable in the eye of law, and the court has the authority t....
Notices issued under tax laws must be addressed to the correct legal entity, and procedural errors may invalidate such notices, requiring rectification in accordance with legal standards.
Reassessment proceedings are invalid if initiated against a non-existent entity and without considering the taxpayer's response, breaching principles of natural justice.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that issuing a notice and passing an order of assessment in the name of a non-existent entity, despite knowledge of its amalgamation, renders th....
Notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act against non-existing companies post-amalgamation are invalid and without jurisdiction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.