SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Harshidhi Security Services – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of tender cancellation and petition (Para 1 , 2)
2. details surrounding the tender process and cancellation (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8)
3. arguments against the arbitrary cancellation of tender (Para 6 , 12)
4. contradictions in tender categorization by respondent (Para 14 , 15 , 29)
5. judicial review principles in tendering process (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
6. final ruling on tender cancellation (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT

1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the Order/Notification bearing No.F6(35)A/PD-4/DDA/2022/119 dated 21.04.2022 issued by the Respondent cancelling the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) bearing No.12/EE/PD-4/DDA/2021-22 dated 26.02.2022.

2. Shorn of details, the facts leading to the instant writ petition are as under:

a) The Petitioner is a partnership firm registered under the provisions of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 and is engaged in carrying out the business of providing security guards, security supervisors, Gunmen, labour supplies placement, labour contractor, mechanized housekeeping, cleaning services and manpower Consultant and Consultancy Services etc.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top