SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Bharat – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application details under cr.p.c. (Para 1)
2. applicant's claims vs. prosecution evidence (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's analysis considering bail (Para 4 , 6)
4. bail rationale under current circumstances (Para 5)
5. bail order issuance and conditions (Para 7 , 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

1. This is the application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, Cr.P.C.) in connection with FIR No.517 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 363/366/376/323/384 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, IPC) and Section 06 of the Protection of Children from of Sexual Offences Act, 2102 (in short, POCSO Act).

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant is in judicial custody since 01.06.2022. According to him, the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The prosecutrix in the instant case is a niece of the applicant. The applicant is aged about 19 years and the applicant being under bona fide believes that the prosecutrix is also major and has developed friendly relations with her. While placing reliance on various WhatsApp chats and photographs, he states that the prosecutrix was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top