SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Public Works Department - Appellant
Versus
Chander Kala - Respondent
W.P.(C) 15230 of 2022, CM Appl. 47155 of 2022
Decided On : 03-11-2022




The court permitted the petitioner to appeal against the gratuity order, emphasizing adherence to procedural laws and stayed recovery until the appeal is resolved.

Headnote:(A) Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Challenge to order of Controlling Authority - Claim for gratuity allowed with interest of 10% per annum from date of superannuation (Para 1).

(B) Appellate Authority - Petitioner granted liberty to appeal, delay in appeal filing condoned, recovery proceedings stayed until appeal is decided (Paras 6 and 7).

Facts of the case:
The writ petition was filed against the Controlling Authority's order directing the payment of gratuity to the respondent amounting to Rs.75,835/- with interest from the date of superannuation.

Findings of Court:
Petitioner granted four weeks to file an appeal, with the condition that recovery proceedings remain stayed.

Issues: The legality of awarding gratuity during muster roll employment and the jurisdiction of the Appellate Authority regarding appeal delay.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to ensure due process within the Appellate Authority's remit while allowing for procedural fairness in pursuing the appeal.

Result: Petition disposed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to gratuity payment order. (Para 1)
2. error in gratuity payment for muster roll period. (Para 2)
3. liberty to appeal granted with stay. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. litigation expenses ordered. (Para 8)
5. petition disposed of with observations. (Para 9)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 47156/2022 (Exemptions)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 15230/2022

1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 9th December, 2021 passed by the learned Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 vide which the claim application of respondent No.1 has been allowed and petitioner has been directed to pay Rs.75,835/- as balance gratuity amount along with simple interest @10% per annum from the date of superannuation of workman i.e. 31st July, 2019.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Controlling Authority has fallen into an error by making the order for payment of gratuity even for the period when the respondent workman was only on a muster roll. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the matter could not be challenged before the Appellate Authority within the period of limitation. It has been further submitted that the Appellate Authority is not empowered to condone the delay beyond the total period of 120 days from the date of receipt of the order.

3. Issue notice.

4. Mr. Manoj Joshi learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

5. Both the learned counsels submit that in identical facts, matters have been relegated back to the Appellate Authority to decide the same in accordance with the law.

6. In view of the submissions made, the petitioner-department is granted liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority in accordance with law within the period of four weeks. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

7. The Appellate Authority shall entertain the appeal if filed on or before 3rd December, 2022 and shall decide the same in accordance with the law. Till 3rd December, 2022, the recovery proceeding shall remain stayed. In case, the petitioner fails to file the appeal on or before 3rd December, 2022 before the Appellate Authority in accordance with law, the respondent shall be at liberty to initiate recovery proceeding against the petitioner-department.

8. Learned counsel for the respondent-workman has pressed for litigation expenses. Following the precedents, the petitioner-department shall pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- as litigation expenses to the widow of the deceased employee within four weeks.

9. With these observations, the present petition along with pending application stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top