Parker H Croft JR vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Parker H Croft JR – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. inclusion of newly discovered assets in estate valuation. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. probate granted with conditions for court fee payment. (Para 8 , 14 , 22)
3. question of amendment for valuation at an advanced stage. (Para 10 , 16 , 17)
4. provisions for extending the grant of certificates. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
5. rectification of valuation certificate is permitted. (Para 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

Neena Bansal Krishna, J. (ORAL)

I.A. 6891/2022 (U/S 151 of CPC, 1908)

1. An application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as "CPC") has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with the prayer to include eight National Savings Certificates and SBI Mutual Fund bearing Folio No. 8415982 under SBI Magnum Global Fund and SBI Mutual Fund bearing Folio No. 8416442 under SBI Contra Fund and also the moveable asset i.e., Kotak Mutual Fund bearing Folio No. 774233 under Kotak Global Emerging Market Fund the name of Late Daljit Singh Bawa, in the Letter of Administration granted vide Order dated 21st September, 2017.

2. It is submitted in the application that the petition filed by the petitioner seeking Probate of the Will dated 12th December, 2005 o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTNEENA BANSAL KRISHNAParker H Croft JR – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Parker H Croft JR – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent