DELHI HIGH COURT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case against the accused. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by both petitioners for bail. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court’s analysis of the evidence and legal standards. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. conclusion regarding denial of bail. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J.
1. Separate Bail applications 2543/2021 and 828/2022 have been preferred on behalf of the petitioners Dinesh Kumar and Vinod Kumar Pandey @ Anand Panday under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 202/2019, under Section 471/474/482 IPC and Section 20, 25 & 29 of NDPS Act, registered at PS Crime Branch, Rohini North.
2. In brief, as per the case of prosecution, on 11.07.2019, acting upon a secret information regarding supply of contraband marijuana i.e. Ganja in Delhi, a trap was laid near Gate No. 1, Bawana Industrial Area. The person who got down from driver side of the truck bearing No. NL-07A-7611 was identified as Dinesh and the one who got down from the other side was identified as Mohd. Kazim @ Laddan by the secret informer and were apprehended by the raiding party. After completion of legal formalities, formal search of the truc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.