SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
GAURANG KANTH
Delhi Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Suraj Mal – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background of employment termination case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. labour court awarded reinstatement and back wages. (Para 10 , 11)
3. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. court's analysis of back wages entitlement. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. evaluation of legal principles governing back wages. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
6. dismissal of writ petition and order for payment. (Para 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT

Gaurang Kanth, J.

1. The present petition has been preferred against the award dated 22.4.2008 ("the impugned award") passed by the Labour Court-VI, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in I.D. No.19/2005. Vide the impugned award, the learned labour court ordered petitioner- corporation to reinstate the respondent with payment of 50% of the back wages.

FACTS RELEVANT FOR ADJUDICATION OF DISPUTE

2. The facts of the case as incorporated by the petitioner in its writ petition is that the respondent was appointed as a driver with petitioner on 29.05.1984. On 03.07.2000, the respondent was consigned with the duty of driving Bus bearing no. DEP-6106 to Sonipat at about 1400 hours from D.T.C. Dichaon Kalan Depot, New Delhi. While in the bus depot, respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top