SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Rakman Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sumaja Electro Infra Private Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal against commercial court decree. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. limitation defense raised by defendant. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. plaintiff's claims regarding cause of action. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. analysis of evidence and admissibility. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. requirements for additional evidence under cpc. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
6. ruling on limitation issues. (Para 30 , 31 , 33 , 34)
7. outcome of the appeal and decree. (Para 35)
8. final order of releasing deposited amount. (Para 36)

JUDGMENT

Amit Mahajan, J.

1. The present appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2021 (hereafter `impugned judgment and decree') passed by learned Commercial Court, Shahdara in Civil Suit (Comm) No. 206/2019 titled as M/s Sumaja Electro Infra Private Limited v/s M/s Rakman Industries Limited.

2. The learned Commercial Court, by way of impugned judgment and decree dated 30.01.2021 decreed the suit in favour of plaintiff (respondent herein) for an amount of Rs.22,46,172/-along with pendente-lite and future interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of filing of the case till the realisation of the amount

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top