Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Ram Guru – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction under pocso act. (Para 1) |
| 2. defense arguments challenging prosecution case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. prosecution's stance on evidence sufficiency. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. evidence collection and witness testimonies. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. judgment summary of trial findings. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 6. application of section 313 cr.p.c. (Para 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 7. testimonies of child and family support conviction. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 8. credibility of prosecutrix's testimony. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 9. rejection of inconsistencies argument. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. final dismissal of appeal and conclusion. (Para 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short `Cr.P.C.') is against the judgment dated 28.04.2017 and order on sentence dated 12.07.2017 passed by the learned ASJ-01, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, in SC No. 440911/2016, whereby, the appellant/accused has been convicted under Section 6 read with Section 5(n) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short `POCSO'), and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 12 years with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment further simple imprisonment for 02
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
