SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1992

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Dipender – Appellant
Versus
State (GNCT of Delhi) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short "Cr.P.C") against the judgement of conviction dated 28.03.2017 and order on sentence dated 30.03.2017 passed by the learned, ASJ-01, (North), Rohini Courts, New Delhi, in case SC No.58469/2014 convicting the appellant for the offence under section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short "POCSO") sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for ten years with a fine of Rs.5000/- in default of payment of fine further simple imprisonment for 30 days and under section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short "IPC") convicting the appellant for a period of three years and fine of Rs 5000/- in default of payment of fine further simple imprisonment for 30 days with direction to run both the sentences concurrently.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the judgment passed by the learned trial court is bad in law and deserves to be set aside. He submits that the learned trial court did not appreciate the evidence in the right perspective, and there are material contradictions and omissions in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top