SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Hamdard National Foundation (India) - Appellant
Versus
Amazon India Limited - Respondent
CS (COMM) 607 of 2022 & I.As. 14189 of 2022, 17631 of 2022
Decided On : 11-11-2022




E-commerce platforms must disclose complete seller details to prevent consumer deception and protect trademark rights, ensuring compliance with applicable legal standards for product authenticity.

Headnote:(A) Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections concerning trademark infringement and remedies - Legal Metrology Act, 2009 - FSSAI regulations - The Plaintiffs, safeguarding rights over the mark 'ROOH AFZA', filed suit against sellers on Amazon selling unauthorized products, emphasizing compliance with legal standards and protection of consumer interest. Claiming confusion over product origin due to seller anonymity, the Court found a prima facie case for injunction. The court ordered immediate removal of infringing listings and adherence to disclosure requirements. (Paras 4, 10, 24, 9)

(B) Consumer Protection - Intermediary liability - E-commerce platforms must ensure transparency in seller information to prevent consumer deception. (Paras 10, 24)

Facts of the case:
The Plaintiffs, with over a century in the market, asserted rights over 'ROOH AFZA', stating infringements by sellers on Amazon of products not manufactured in accordance with legal requirements, leading to potential consumer deception.

Findings of Court:
The Court determined a prima facie case for an ad-interim injunction, asserting that balance of convenience favored the Plaintiffs and failure to act would cause irreparable injury.

Issues: The main issues centered on trademark protection and the responsibility of e-commerce platforms in identifying sellers and ensuring the authenticity of products sold.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that e-commerce platforms hold a duty to provide complete seller details to avoid consumer confusion regarding product authenticity, ruling that without such measures, statutory rights of the Plaintiffs could be compromised.

Result: Suit decreed in favor of the Plaintiffs, ordering removal of infringing listings.

Table of Content
1. historical background and ownership of 'rooh afza'. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. grievance regarding unauthorized sales on amazon. (Para 5 , 6)
3. permanent injunction against unauthorized use of trademark. (Para 9 , 10)
4. decree issuance and disposal of applications. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present suit has been filed by Plaintiff No.1 - Hamdard National Foundation (India) and Plaintiff No.2 - Hamdard Dawakhana also trading as Hamdard Laboratories India against Defendant No.1 - Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Limited and Defendant No.2 - M/s. Golden Leaf, C/o Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Limited. The suit relates to the product and mark of the Plaintiffs `ROOH AFZA'.

3. The case of the Plaintiffs is that Plaintiff Nos.1 & 2 are engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling various Unani and Ayurvedic medicines, oils, syrups and non-alcoholic beverages. The Hamdard Group of the Plaintiffs has a history which dates back to over 100 years when well-known Unani practitioner `Hakeem Hafiz Abdul Majeed' set up a Unani clinic under the name `Hamdard Dawakhana'. Over the years, the activities of the Plaintiffs have expanded and they have been involved in research and development.

4. The Plaintiffs own rights in the marks `HAMDARD' and `ROOH AFZA' details of which are mentioned in paragraph no. 11 of the plaint. The mark `ROOH AFZA' was adopted by the Plaintiffs in 1907 and the said product is a market leader in its segment. The mark `ROOH AFZA' has been used by the Plaintiffs for a range of products including non-alcoholic sharbets and beverages, for which Plaintiff No.2 has obtained the assignment on 11th August, 1975 from Plaintiff No.1. The mark ROOH AFZA is registered in India and one of the registrations of the Plaintiffs dates back to 3rd August, 1942. Other trademarks have also been registered by the Plaintiffs for variants of `ROOH AFZA', including the labels and flavour variants etc., The annual sales of the products under the mark `ROOH AFZA' brand are over Rs.200 crores and a substantial amount has also been incurred by the Plaintiffs in the advertisement and promotion of the brand.

5. The grievance of the Plaintiffs in the present case is that Defendant No.1, runs the e-commerce website www.amazon.in. Defendant No.2, which claims to have the contact details - C/o Amazon Sellers Service Pvt. Ltd., 26/1, 10th Floor, Brigade World Trade Center, Dr. Rajkumar Road, Bengaluru-560055 (Karnataka), is a seller on the www.amazon.in platform selling and offering for sale the product `ROOH AFZA' (hereinafter, `impugned products'). The said sellers were `M/s Royal Sales' and `M/s. Good Health Enterprises'. Upon these notices having been issued on 4th September, 2021 and 9th December, 2021, the said listings were removed from www.amazon.in platform. However, recently another listing by one `M/s. Golden Leaf' was found by the Plaintiffs on the website of Defendant No.1 and upon clicking on `Golden Leaf', the contact details were shown as `C/o Amazon Sellers Services Pvt. Ltd'. The Plaintiffs effected purchases of the said product on 6th December, 2021 and found to their utter shock and surprise that the said product was not manufactured by the Plaintiffs. Ld. counsel for the Plaintiffs submits that the said product is manufactured in Pakistan and also does not comply with the legal requirements of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred as "LMA"), the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011, and the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred as `FSSAI') which governs such products.

6. On 5th September, 2022, when the suit was listed before this Court, Mr. Siddharth Chopra, ld. Counsel appearing for Defendant No.1 had submitted that if the URLs of the infringing listings are furnished to him, the same shall be taken down. On the said date, complete papers were directed to be supplied to ld. Co



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top