SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
YASHWANT VARMA
Rajiv Chakraborty Resolution Professional of Eiel – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A. PROLOUGE

1. This writ petition raises the important question of the impact that a moratorium that comes into effect in terms of Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 20061 would have on the powers of the Enforcement Directorate2 to enforce an attachment under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 20023 . The petition raises a challenge to orders of attachment which have been made by the ED in exercise of powers conferred by the PMLA. While the writ petition as originally framed had assailed the validity of Provisional Attachment Orders4 dated 08 July 2020 and 05 August 2020, subsequently and since those orders came to be confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority, an amendment application was moved questioning the confirmation orders dated 01 January 2021 and 29 January 2021. The petition has been instituted by the Resolution Professional5 of Era Infra Engineering Limited6 which was admitted to insolvency proceedings under the provisions of the IBC. The challenge to the orders of attachment is essentially founded on the provisions of Section 14 of the aforesaid enactment with the petitioner contending that once the moratorium had come

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top