SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Vikram Bakshi – Appellant
Versus
Sonia Khosla – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of arbitration application. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
2. disputes on land ownership affecting arbitration. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
3. jurisdiction analysis regarding arbitration. (Para 54 , 56 , 80)
4. determination of control of the company. (Para 65 , 66 , 72)
5. disputes declared non-arbitrable. (Para 106 , 107)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

I.A. No.16577/2021

1. This is an application to bring on record legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.1, Mrs. Sonia Khosla.

2. Mr. Deepak Khosla, who is arrayed as one of the legal heirs, submits that he has no objection to the application being allowed.

3. The application is allowed. The amended memo of parties is taken on record.

ARB.P. 323/2010

4. This is a Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Mr. Vikram Bakshi, seeking nomination of two arbitrators for the Petitioner as well as for the Respondents together and for the Arbitral Tribunal to appoint a presiding Arbitrator and to continue to hold arbitration proceedings from the stage where the previous Arbitral Tribunal had resigned.

5. The case between the par













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top