SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
JASMEET SINGH
Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. quashing of fir based on complaint details. (Para 1 , 2)
2. discussion of icc findings on complaints. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court examines the credibility of the complaint. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. parameters for quashing due to lack of cognizable offence. (Para 9 , 10)
5. dismissal of petition and concluding remarks. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Jasmeet Singh, J. (ORAL)

1. This is a petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 44/2014 dated 07.03.2014, under Sections 354-A/509 IPC, registered at Police Station- Maurice Nagar, North Delhi District, New Delhi.

2. In the FIR, it has been stated by the complainant as under:

    ".... This is to inform you that on 21.01.2014 around 10:23 a.m. while crossing me in the corridor of the Mathematics Department, University of Delhi, Prof. Ajay Kumar (HOD- Maths University of Delhi) stared at me and passed lewd (wrongly spelt as lend in the complaint) sexual remarks to me which I am mentioning immediately made verbatim "Fuck you", As a result, I made a complaint to the Vice-Chancellor about this incident with a copy to the registrar which is a procedure for us to do. But no action/reply was received from the university authorities. Thus, you are r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top