SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Ranjeet – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to quash transfer orders due to wife's medical condition. (Para 1 , 1 , 2)
2. respondents argue against petitioner's request citing terms of employment. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court grants extension based on medical circumstances. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. By way of present petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

    a) Quash the HQ DG BSF Signal No.R/3127 dated 06.06.2022, order No.1111-C/Pers (P&T)-II/SDG (EC)/MS/2022/3052-3167 dated 15.06.2022 and order No. IGA/Estt-II/P&T-HC/Min/2022/5155-5551 dated 24.06.2022;

    b) Quash the rejection Signal No.115306/IG/DIG dated 10.11.2022 rejecting the representation of the Petitioner;

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the wife of the petitioner was diagnosed with "Ear Discharge with Decreased Hearing" in 2014 for which she is still undergoing medication and has also already undergone three surgeries. He further submits that she also suffers from Thyrotoxicosis and due to this problem of thyroid, she has suffered four miscarriages, the last one being on 16.11.2022. He thus prays that the transfer orders of the petitioner from Delhi to Tripura be deferred.

3. Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, le

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top