SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Pooja Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Mohit Kumar – Respondent


Table of Content
1. non-payment of maintenance obligations (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. failure to comply with court orders (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. importance of compliance even during appeals (Para 10 , 11)
4. guilt of contempt and punishment (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

ORDER

1. Respondent is present in Court today, in compliance with the order of this Court dated 01.11.2022.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that Respondent has failed to make payment of maintenance in terms of the order dated 04.12.2021, passed by Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Court - 2 (South District), Saket Court, New Delhi (`Trial Court'). He states that there are arrears of Rs. 4,85,000/due and payable by the Respondent and the last payment was received by the Petitioner on 06.09.2022 for a sum of Rs. 50,000/-.

3. He further states that there has been change in circumstances during the pendency of the present petition. The Petitioner along with her children resides in a tenanted premises, which have been leased by the Respondent. A decree for possession has been passed by the Civil Court in favour of the Landlord, on the basis of statement made by the Respondent herein recording his willingness to surre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top