DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Indu Rani @ Indu Rathi – Appellant
Versus
Pushpa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. inheritance of property without consent. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. legal grounds for the plaintiffs' and defendants' arguments. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. analysis of legal standards of succession. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 4. no cause of action established in the plaint. (Para 29) |
JUDGMENT
Amit Bansal, J.
I.A. 12065/2020 (of defendant no.2 under O-VII R-11 of CPC) and I.A. 1647/2021 (of the defendant no.1 under O-VII R-11 of CPC)
1. By way of this judgment, I shall decide the applications filed on behalf of the defendant no.1 and the defendant no.2 under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) seeking rejection of plaint.
PLEADINGS IN THE PLAINT
2. The pleadings in the plaint relevant for deciding the present applications are set out hereinafter:
I. Plaintiff's father, late Shri Ram Gopal was the owner/Bhumidar of the land measuring 41 bighas and 9 biswas bearing Khasras no.20/6/1 (4-14), 20/20 (4-16), 21 (4-16), 32/1 (4-9), 10 (4-12), 4 (4-9), 5 (4-12), 6 (4-11), 7 (4-9), 26 (0-1), in the revenue estate of Village Iradat Nagar, Naya Bans, Delhi-110082 (`suit land'), which was an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.