SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Indu Rani @ Indu Rathi – Appellant
Versus
Pushpa – Respondent


Table of Content
1. inheritance of property without consent. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. legal grounds for the plaintiffs' and defendants' arguments. (Para 6 , 7)
3. analysis of legal standards of succession. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
4. no cause of action established in the plaint. (Para 29)

JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J.

I.A. 12065/2020 (of defendant no.2 under O-VII R-11 of CPC) and I.A. 1647/2021 (of the defendant no.1 under O-VII R-11 of CPC)

1. By way of this judgment, I shall decide the applications filed on behalf of the defendant no.1 and the defendant no.2 under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) seeking rejection of plaint.

PLEADINGS IN THE PLAINT

2. The pleadings in the plaint relevant for deciding the present applications are set out hereinafter:

I. Plaintiff's father, late Shri Ram Gopal was the owner/Bhumidar of the land measuring 41 bighas and 9 biswas bearing Khasras no.20/6/1 (4-14), 20/20 (4-16), 21 (4-16), 32/1 (4-9), 10 (4-12), 4 (4-9), 5 (4-12), 6 (4-11), 7 (4-9), 26 (0-1), in the revenue estate of Village Iradat Nagar, Naya Bans, Delhi-110082 (`suit land'), which was an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top