Banarsi Lal vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA, ANISH DAYAL
Banarsi Lal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. details of the deceased's death and postmortem findings. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. circumstantial evidence and challenges to prosecution's case. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. witness testimonies corroborating the facts. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. analysis of the last seen evidence. (Para 21 , 22)
5. medical evidence supporting cause of death. (Para 23 , 27)
6. motive established through witness deposed. (Para 30 , 31)
7. burden of proof shifts to the appellant. (Para 32 , 33 , 34)
8. validation of the conviction upholding the original judgment. (Para 36 , 37)

JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. By this appeal, the appellant challenges the impugned judgment dated 30th September, 2019 whereby the learned Trial Court convicted the appellant for offences punishable under Section 302/201 of IPC and the order on sentence dated 30th November, 2019 directing the appellant to undergo life imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.10,000/- under Section 302 IPC, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years along with a fine of Rs.5,000/- under Section 201 IPC, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMUKTA GUPTA, ANISH DAYALBanarsi Lal – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA, ANISH DAYAL
Banarsi Lal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent