SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Kush Raj Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
DLF Power & Services Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Neena Bansal Krishna, J.

REVIEW PET. 298/2022

1. A Review Petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as "CPC") has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking review of the order/judgement dated 12th October, 2022. By this order/judgment, the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 1996") was dismissed by observing that this Court had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present petition.

2. It is submitted that traditionally the definition of "Location" as provided under the Black's Law Dictionary means "the specific place or position of a person or thing". Inadvertently, the definition of Location as provided in the Black's Dictionary has not been considered by this Court.

3. It is further asserted that the submissions made by the petitioner had been over looked/not recorded to come to the finding that there is no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present petition. This is sequitur to the judgments of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court wherein similar Arbitration clause has been interpreted to hold that this Cour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top