Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Gaurav Garg – Appellant
Versus
Girdhar Gopal Gupta – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consent of parties allows final disposal. (Para 1) |
| 2. the petitioner seeks production of customary sale documents. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. defendant argues against document production. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court affirms trial court's reasoning on document possession. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. impugned order upheld. (Para 12) |
| 6. petition dismissed with no costs. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT
Tushar Rao Gedela, J. (ORAL)
1. With the consent of parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
2. The petitioner challenges the order dated 07.03.2018 passed by the learned Trial Court upon an application filed under Order 11 Rule 12 and 14 read with Section 151 CPC seeking directions to defendant Nos. 1 to 3 for production of certain documents. Learned counsel submits that in the written statement the stand of respondent No.1/defendant No.1 is that the defendant No.4 is in possession of a portion of the property after "customary" documents of sale were executed by respondent No.1/defendant No.1 for consideration.
3. Learned counsel also submits that the written statement refers to the sale of the property by "customary" documents. Learned counsel submits that despite stati
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
