Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
State – Appellant
Versus
Chaman @ Chamari – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of offences and prosecution procedures. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's review of evidence and procedural correctness. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. validity of additional charges and dismissal rationale. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 4. dismissal of petition and final order. (Para 10) |
ORDER
CRL.M.A. 479/2019 (for condonation of delay)
1. This is an application for condonation of 03 days delay in filing the present petition.
2. For the reasons stated therein, the delay is condoned.
3. The application is disposed of.
CRL.REV.P. 31/2019
4. This revision is directed against the order dated 19.09.2018, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (North East), whereby, the matter has been sent to the court of Metropolitan Magistrate for conducting the trial against the respondent/accused for offence punishable under Section 323/341/506/34 of the IPC. The learned APP submits that if the subsequent complaint is perused carefully, the same would clearly reveal that the offence under Section 397 of the IPC is made out against the respondents.
5. The submissions made by the learned APP are opposed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
6. I have considered the submissi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
