Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Nutan Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Nath Thakur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's legal claim and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding evidence and appeal. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. definitions of 'aggrieved person', 'domestic relationship', and 'domestic violence'. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. requirement for evidence to prove claims under pwdva. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court's decision on evidence opportunities and application dismissal. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. final order allowing limited further evidence. (Para 16) |
| 7. court's concluding remarks and disposition of the case. (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
1. The present revision petition under Sections 397/401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.") has been filed by the petitioner challenging judgment dated 19.02.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-Special Fast Track Court, Saket Courts, New Delhi ("Appellate Court") in appeal C.A. No. 253/17 filed under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 ("PWDVA") against judgment and order dated 13.04.2017 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Court-01, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi("Trial Court") in Complaint Case No. 337/1/09.
2. The case of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
