SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Yogesh Khanna, J.
Sachin Makade - Appellant
Versus
Narcotics Control Bureau, New Delhi - Respondent
Bail Appln. 1410 of 2022 and Bail Appln. 1710 of 2022, Crl.M.(Bail) 1127 of 2022, Crl.M.A. 13100 of 2022, 13376 of 2022
Decided On : 08-12-2022




Corroborative evidence alone is insufficient for conviction under NDPS Act, necessitating substantial direct evidence; bail granted due to lengthy custody without conclusive evidence.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 22(c), 23(c), 24, 25, 27A and 29 - The accused faced prosecution for large-scale trafficking of narcotic tablets through a network involving multiple co-accused, leading to substantial seizures from various locations - The evidentiary value of corroborative evidence was discussed in light of the NDPS Act. (Paras 1, 2, 10, 14)

(B) Bail - Court’s discretion - Considering the period of custody, lack of direct evidence against the accused, and the precedent that corroborative evidence alone is insufficient for conviction, bail was granted to the accused. (Paras 10, 14)

Facts of the case:
The accused were implicated in a significant narcotics case with recoveries of tablets from parcels and residences, revealing an elaborate trafficking operation. The accused argued the lack of direct evidence connecting them to the crime, being in custody for several years, and fulfilling bail conditions.

Findings of Court:
The court granted bail based on the precedence regarding corroborative evidence and the length of detention without conclusive evidence against the petitioners.

Issues: The main issues included the adequacy of evidence for prosecuting the accused under the NDPS Act and the appropriateness of bail under the stipulated circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that without substantial evidence linking the accused directly to drug trafficking, the reliance on corroborative evidence was insufficient for maintaining detention under the NDPS Act.

Result: Bail granted.

Table of Content
1. facts surrounding the narcotics case. (Para 1)
2. arguments on the sufficiency of evidence. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's analysis regarding evidentiary standards. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. previous case references impact on bail. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. final conclusion on bail granted. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT

Yogesh Khanna, J.

1. Both the petitions are being considered together. The brief facts are:

a) a prosecution complaint has been filed under Sections 22(c), 23(c), 24, 25, 27A read-with Section 29, NDPS Act before the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi against the accused persons, i.e. Dipu Singh, Sachin Makade, Barun Surendra Chauhan, Tejas Rajesh Patel, Bablu Bhagwan Dangre, Taha Toufique, Oliva Sinha and Rohit Sanghpal Gaurkhede.

b) on 31.01.2020, on the basis of an information, following recovery and seizure was effected on 31.01.2020: i) 4200 Tablets of Zolpidam (1.050 Kg) and ii) 6000 Tablets of Alprazolam (1.200Kg) from parcel bearing No. 535153356 destined to Great Britain, lying at TNT India Pvt. Ltd. (Fedex Courier) near new Custom House, IGI Airport. The documents attached with said parcel, revealed during investigations the address and mobile number of the consignor / accused Dipu Singh who was located in Lucknow and the recovery of tablets - narcotic medicines (drugs) was effected and seized vide Panchnama dated 01-02-2020, i.e. 12,000 Tablets of Tramadol (4.800 Kgs) being recovered from the residence of accused Dipu Singh at 551 KA/G-182, Azad Nagar, Alam Bagh, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh;

c) consequent upon the recovery of such commercial quantity from the parcel and further recovery of commercial quantity of Narcotic Tablets from the residence of Dipu Singh, who upon examination had voluntarily tendered his statement, under section 67, NDPS Act and admitted of committing an offence under NDPS Act. He further disclosed the names of other person involved in said illegal dealing with narcotic tablets and revealed the modus operandi of sending parcels not only from India but also parcels provided from Singapore to his clients. Investigations revealed involvement of co-accused Tejas Patel, Sachin Makade, Barun Surendra Chauhan, Bablu Bhagwan Dangre, and also disclosed their modus operandi followed in the commission of offences under the NDPS Act;

d) accused Dipu Singh had disclosed one Tejas Patel of M/s.Krivi Export and M/s.Azesto Impex, Nagpur is also involved along with him and he made shipments of Tramadol through him, who operate from such firms at Nagpur, Maharashtra;

e) During investigation the officers of NCB reached the office of said M/s.Azesto Impex Private Ltd., Tirupati Emperial 1, Nirala Society, plot no. 229, shop no. 1 & 2, 1st Floor Dighori, Nagpur, Maharashtra and upon inquiry the staff revealed Sachin Pandurang Makade and Barun Surendra Chauhan are the owners of the firm and though Tejas was working in the firm but he has separate firm in the name of M/s.Krivi Export. The computer kept in the office of aforesaid persons were checked and entries related to sending of narcotic medicines were found. During examination, one of their staff Udit informed main office of the firm is at plot no. 332, near Panchvati Ashram, Chitnis Nagar, Nagpur, Maharashtra. The Laptops containing entries /documents relating to illegal business of Tramadol, the printout of the documents, all were seized and were taken into possession vide Panchnama dated 11.02.2020;

f) further on 11.02.2020 the team of NCB searched the office of M/s.Azesto Impex private Limited at Plot No. 332, near Panchvati Ashram, Chitnis Nagar, Nagpur, Maharashtra and in such office Sachin Makade, Barun Chauhan, Tejas Patel, Bablu and Amol were all found present. During investigations, search of the personal mobile phones and laptops of Sachin Makade, Barun Chauhan and Tejas Patel were checked and mails were found regarding orders of Narcotic tablets and chats. The files were also found. During inve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top