Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Bhim Sen – Appellant
Versus
Mukul Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. marriage validity and legal standing in family courts (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on maintainability of petitions (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. family court's procedural authority (Para 6 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. substantive legal rights versus procedural petitions (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. locus standi in marriage-related petitions (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. application of case precedent in family law (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. court's role in protecting marital relationships (Para 23 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. dismissal of appeal on merit (Para 27 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 52083-2022
1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 187/2022
2. The petition filed by the Appellant under Section 7(1) (b) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 seeking declaration that Respondent no.1 remains legally and validly married to respondent no.2 as on the date of the application, has been rejected as not being maintainable.
3. The Appellant had filed the subject petition under Section 7(1) (b) of the Family Courts Act contending that he is a retired Lieutenant Colonel, and his daughter aged 28 years got married to Respondent no.1 on 16.08.2016 without his consent, and on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
