SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Tushar Jain - Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Appln. 802 of 2021
Decided On : 14-12-2022




The court emphasized that bail decisions must be based on the totality of circumstances, focusing on factors like the accused's involvement and the nature of the charges, rather than applying a formulaic approach.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 376 - Anticipatory bail application - Application treated as a regular bail request after filing of chargesheet - FIR allegeing physical relationship under false pretext of marriage - Parties married post-FIR but later divorced by mutual consent - Considerations for bail include nature of charge, involvement of accused, and severity of punishment. (Paras 1-4)

Facts of the case:
The complainant alleged physical relationship under false pretenses; after FIR, the applicant and complainant married and later divorced. Chargesheet filed, and no arrest was made. (Paras 3, 5)

Findings of Court:
Anticipatory bail granted, subject to conditions including a personal bond and ensuring communication with the Investigating Officer. (Paras 6, 7)

Issues: Whether anticipatory bail can be granted post-arrest; consideration of facts relating to relationship and divorce.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that each bail application must be considered individually, weighing factors such as the prima facie case, seriousness of the charges, and the applicant's character. (Paras 4, 6)

Result: Anticipatory bail granted, subject to conditions.

Table of Content
1. nature of the case and relationship history. (Para 1 , 3)
2. factors considered for bail. (Para 2 , 4)
3. ongoing proceedings and interim protection. (Para 5)
4. bail granted under specific conditions. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--This is an application for anticipatory bail in the case of FIR No.506/2020, Police Station Adarsh Nagar under Section 376 IPC.

2. At the outset, Learned counsel for the petitioner/accused submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be treated as an application for regular bail since the chargesheet has been filed.

3. The facts of this case are peculiar in nature. FIR was lodged on the statement of the complainant Ms. AA alleging that the applicant established a physical relationship with her on the false pretext of marriage. Admittedly, after the lodging of the FIR, the marriage between the Imagecomplainant/prosecutrix and the petitioner/accused had taken place and the parties lived as husband and wife for some time. However, matrimonial disputes arose and now both parties have taken divorce by mutual consent.

4. The grant of bail requires the consideration of various factors which ultimately depends upon the specific facts and circumstances of the case before the Court. There is no straight jacket formula which can ever be prescribed as to what the relevant factors could be. However, certain important factors that are always considered, inter alia, relate to prima facie involvement of the accused, nature and gravity of the charge, severity of the punishment, and the character, position and standing of the accused Reliance can be placed on State of U.P. v. Amarmani Tripathi, (2005) 8 SCC 21.

5. In the present case, the petitioner/accused was never arrested by the Investigating agency. After the investigation, the chargesheet was filed and the case is at the stage of PE. It is also pertinent to note that the petitioner/accused is enjoying interim protection from this Court.

6. I consider that in the totality of the facts and circumstances, in event of arrest, the petitioner/applicant be admitted to regular bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court subject to the following conditions:

a) the Applicant shall under no circumstances leave India without prior intimation of the Court concerned;

b) the Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case;

c) the Applicant shall provide his/her mobile number(s) to the Investigating Officer and keep it operational at all times;

d) In case of a change of residential address and/or mobile number, the Applicant shall intimate the same to the Investigating Officer/Court concerned by way of an affidavit.

7. The bail application stands disposed of in the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top