Om Prakash vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. orders for forensic examination guidelines. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's challenge to coercive compliance. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. adverse inference can be drawn for non-compliance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. modification of trial court's order. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--Present petitions have been filed challenging the order dated 18.03.2019 by the learned trial court whereby the learned trial court inter alia directed that the CD Ex.PW-12/Article-1 and the Pen Drive Kingston 8GB Ex.PW8/Article-1 be sent to the FSL Rohini (1) for comparison of the face of the complainant as well as for the face recognition of the accused (2) to compare the voice of the complainant with the questioned voice in CD Ex.PW-12/Article-1 as well as in Pen Drive Ex.PW-8/Article-1 (3) to compare the voice of the accused with the question voice in CD Ex.PW-12/Article-1 as well as in Pen Drive Ex.PW-8/Article-1.

2. Learned trial court further directed that the accused shall not be made to read any inculpatory statement or transcript of the conversation in question but shall be made to read out words and sentences which are not inculpatory and are not the exact reproduction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document