Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
State (GNCT of Delhi) – Appellant
Versus
Sameer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision petition details and case background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by parties regarding discharge. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's review of the trial court's order. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. definition and requirements under section 328 ipc. (Para 7) |
| 5. discussion on forensic evidence and its impact. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. court's decision to remand case for fresh order. (Para 10) |
| 7. conclusion and clarification regarding observations. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. (ORAL)
1. The present revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.") has been filed by the petitioner/State for setting aside/quashing the impugned order dated 09.08.2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge ("ASJ"), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Case FIR No. 1001/2015 under Sections 365/354/328/323/34/174A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC") at Police Station ("PS") Mahendra Park, Delhi titled as "State v. Sameer & Ors." whereby learned Trial Court discharged the respondents from the offence punishable under Section 328 IPC.
2. The brief facts of the case are that on 07.11.2015, respondents/accused persons, in furtherance of
For an offence under Section 328 IPC, forensic evidence is essential for determining the nature of substances administered to the victim, and a trial court must review all relevant evidence, includin....
The court reiterated that a promise of marriage does not constitute consent in cases of sexual assault, emphasizing the need for prima facie evidence for charge framing.
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant administered a stupefying substance with intent to cause injury, leading to the acquittal.
Conviction under Section 328 of the IPC requires corroborative medical evidence; mere oral testimony is insufficient.
The Trial Court must wait for all relevant reports and evidence before discharging an accused, and the judgment should be based on whether the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of evidence to determine the nature of the offences and the intention of the accused, as well as the consideration of the accused's ....
The intention or knowledge of an accused under Section 308 IPC has to be ascertained only prima facie at the stage of charge, based on the injury caused to the victim.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
