Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
GKC Projects Limited – Appellant
Versus
National Highways Authority of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Subramonium Prasad, J.
1. Aggrieved by the rejection of its bid with respect to a Request for Proposal ("RFP") issued by the Respondent for Development of a Six-Lane Access Controlled Highway from Ranipur Barsi (Saharanpur District) to Adhoya Musalmana (Ambala District) (From Ch. 45+500 To 84+400) of Shamli - Ambala Section of Bareilly - Ludhiana Economic Corridor on EPC Mode under Bharatmala Pariyojana Phase-I in the State of Haryana (Package-2) (hereinafter referred to as "Project") by communications dated 22.07.2022 and 28.07.2022, the Petitioner has filed the instant petition challenging the said communications.
2. The facts, in brief, leading to the instant petition are as under:
a) The Petitioner is an unlisted public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of infrastructure development and execution of Engineering, Procurement Construction and Commissioning (EPCC) and Lumpsum Turnkey (LSK) facilities in various infrastructure projects in the country.
b) The Respondent had invited a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the abovementioned project and the Petitioner was one of the bidders in the said project. In response
The court affirmed that the interpretation of 'Net Worth' in tender documents rests with the author, emphasizing the necessity for clarity in bid evaluations and limiting judicial intervention unless....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of reserves arising out of capital and revenue profit in the definition of 'Net Worth' and the need for legal certainty and consiste....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principle of limited judicial interference in tender decisions, emphasizing the authority of the tendering entity in interpreting tender docume....
Judicial review in tender matters is limited to assessing arbitrariness, irrationality, or mala fides; decisions should reflect fair competition and not accommodate late submissions of corrected bids....
Judicial review of tender decisions is limited to instances of mala fides or arbitrary actions; a tendering authority's judgment on technical specifications is paramount unless proven fundamentally f....
The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in tender matters, the importance of punctilious and rigid enforcement of tender terms, and the uniform application of tender requirements to....
The court upheld the authority's discretion in evaluating tender bids, emphasizing the need for compliance with mandatory conditions and the absence of arbitrariness in disqualification decisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
