Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Goyal MG Gases Private Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Messer Griesheim GMBH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the appeal and background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. execution details and background of agreements. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. arguments regarding jurisdiction and enforceability. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. discussion on the relevant financial agreements and claims. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. consideration of evidence and procedural fairness. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. analysis of foreign judgment enforcement and indian law. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. final observations on claims and statutory obligations. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. the necessity of leave to defend in summary proceedings. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 9. conclusion regarding the implications of findings. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 10. the appeal is allowed, setting aside the lower judgment. (Para 65) |
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
1. The present appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 29.11.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge vide which the objections filed by the appellant/Judgment Debtor (JD) in Ex.P. 70/2006, titled as MESSER GRIESHEIM GMBH Vs. Goyal MG Gases Pvt. Ltd., pertaining to execution of decree dated 07.02.2006 of the High Cou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
