IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Tushar Rao Gedela, J.
Suchit Prasad Jain - Appellant
Versus
Neeraj Puri - Respondent
CM(M) 1453 of 2022, CM Appl. 55938 of 2022 & CM Appl. 55939 of 2022
Decided On : 22-12-2022
JUDGMENT
Tushar Rao Gedela, J. (ORAL)
[The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode]
1. With the consent of parties, the present petition is taken up for disposal.
2. After some hearing and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that interests of justice would be sub-served if the impugned order dated 01.10.2022 is modified.
3. As per the impugned order, the petitioner was directed to deposit the arrears arising up till that date. Both the counsel have consented that the petitioner be directed to deposit the rent and the arrears of the rent @ 3200 Sq. ft. for the demised premises before the learned Trial Court. Out of this, Respondent landlord would be entitled to the agreed rent and its arrears @ 2498.37 Sq. ft. and withdraw the same. The balance amount would be retained by the learned Trial Court to be disbursed to the party, which is found entitled to, as per the final judgment to be passed by the Trial Court.
4. The aforesaid modification is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of either of the parties, who shall be entitled to raise all contentions before the learned Trial Court, which is yet to decide the lis.
5. Mr. Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the future rent would be deposited by the petitioner @ 3200 Sq. ft., on regular basis. It is also directed, that out of the future rent, the respondent landlord would be entitled to withdraw at the aforesaid rate of 2498.37 Sq. ft.
6. Deposit, as directed above be made within thirty days from today. Interest, if any, would be ascertained by the learned Trial Court during trial.
7. In view of the consent, the impugned order dated 01.10.2022 stands modified, as above. Nothing remains to be decided by this Court. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
8. The learned Trial Court may continue its proceedings.
Modification of interim orders is permissible upon party consent, which does not affect the fundamental rights to contest in Trial Court proceedings.
Judicial review of procedural errors in determining rent arrears timelines under rent control legislation.
Enforcement of payment agreement and withdrawal of suit based on mutual agreement.
In an appeal against a money decree, an appellate court granting a stay of execution under Order XLI Rule 5(3) must ensure that the appellant provides sufficient security for the entire decree amount....
Mandatory compliance with rent deposit requirements under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act is essential to avoid eviction for non-payment; the court cannot extend time unless a timely application....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.