SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Anil Kumar Singh - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8621 of 2021
Decided On : 22-12-2022




Adoptions finalized before the implementation of new regulations are not bound by those regulations for processing No-objection Certificates.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Adoption - The petitioners adopted a child in 2011, but faced obstacles obtaining a No-objection Certificate (NOC) from the Respondent due to regulations enforceable only post-adoption. A decree was passed declaring the petitioners as the legal adoptive parents. The court found that NOC should not be restricted by later regulations for prior adoptions. (Paras 1-8)

(B) Administrative Procedure - The court observed that despite the timeline of regulations changing post-adoption, it was imperative for the Respondent to process the NOC.

Findings of Court:
The adoption predating the regulations necessitated the issuance of the NOC by CARA within 30 days.

Issues: The primary issue was the applicability of Adoption Regulations, 2022, to adoptions prior to their enactment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the adoption deed being registered implies legal authority and the court upholds the declaratory decree affirming the petitioners' status as legal adoptive parents.

Result: The petition is allowed.

Table of Content
1. adoption process and noc request (Para 2 , 3)
2. cara's regulations and court's observation (Para 4 , 5)
3. issuance of noc despite verification pending (Para 7)
4. final order granting relief to petitioners (Para 8)

ORDER

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by Petitioner No.1-Shri Anil Kumar Singh and his wife, Petitioner No.2-Mrs. Sonika Singh who are Non-Resident Indians. The Petitioners adopted a child-Navya Singh on 2nd August, 2011 from her biological parents. The adoption deed was registered on 3rd August, 2011. The Petitioners filed an application before the UK border agency for entry clearance in the UK which was rejected due to lack of a No-objection from the Indian adoption agency. Thereafter, repeated attempts made by the Petitioners to obtain an NOC from the Respondent, CARA from 2011 to 2016 were futile. The stand of CARA at that stage was that an adoption under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 was not covered. Finally, Petitioners filed a civil suit for declaration under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 in the Court of Civil Judge, Sr. Division. A decree declaring Petitioners to be the legal adoptive parents of Ms. Navya Singh was passed by the said court on 25th August, 2017.

3. Subsequently, the Petitioner sent letters to the Respondent requesting CARA to recognise the adoption and to issue the NOC under the Hague Convention. In the meantime, CARA also conducted the verification of the documents and a Home Study Report (`HSR') was also prepared in the case of the Petitioners. Despite this, the current position is that the NOC has not been issued by CARA.

4. On the last date, the official from CARA was requested to be present online to assist the Court. Today, ld. Counsel for CARA, along with Mr. Jagannath Pati, Director, Program at CARA, has appeared and submits that in terms of, Adoption Regulations, 2022 (hereinafter `Regulations') the matter has been sent for verification to the District Magistrate.

5. The Court finds that in the present case the adoption dates back to 2011 and the application seeking NOC was filed much before the Regulations came into force on 23rd September, 2022. The Regulations have been notified and current applications, would require verification by the District Magistrate. However, in the present case a declaratory decree has already been passed to the following effect:

    "6. In the light of the circumstances of the case and the fact that in their written statement the defendants no.1 and 2 have admitted the present case of the plaintiffs no.1 and 2 and keeping in view the plaintiffs evidence led by the plaintiffs, this court is of the considered view that the prayer of the plaintiffs for declaring them as the legal adoptive parents of the adopted child namely Navya Singh can be allowed keeping in mind the facts and circumstances of the present case.

    7. In view of the aforesaid discussion the present suit is hereby decreed in favour of the plaintiffs wherein the plaintiffs are declared as legal adoptive parents of the adopted child namely Navya Singh."

6. The HSR is also prepared. The adoption deed is a registered adoption deed. In these circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that the application being prior to the coming into force of Adoption Regulations, 2022, the said adoption would not be strictly required to be dealt with in the procedure prescribed in the said Regulations.

7. Mr. Jagannath Pati submits that the District Magistrate has already been contacted and is likely to send the verification shortly. Irrespective of whether the DM's verification, is received or not, in the unique facts of this case, which predates the coming into force of the Regulations, the NOC shall now be processed and issued by Respondent to the Petitioners within a period of 30 days from today, subject to availability of all documents on the record of CARA.

8. With these observations, the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top