IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Aero Globe Facility - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 17790 of 2022 and CM Appls. 56837 of 2022, 56838 of 2022 and 56839 of 2022
Decided On : 04-01-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility of bidders and rfp conditions. (Para 2 , 4 , 6 , 8) |
| 2. arguments for reconsideration of bids. (Para 3 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. clarifications on bid evaluation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. interpretation of financial capacity criteria. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. order for listing and interim relief notice. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioners which are Ground Handling Agents and have been providing `Ground Handling Services' at various airports in the country. The Petitioners are part of a Consortium, with Petitioner No.1 - Aero-Globe Facility Management as the lead member having 51% share, Petitioner No.2 - Sri Sai Sampat Aviation Handling Service having 26% share, and Petitioner No.3 - Airclub Aviation Private Limited having 23% share in the Consortium.
3. The Petitioners have preferred the present petition challenging the rejection of their Technical bids and non-consideration of their Financial bids for Ground-Handling Services in respect of multiple airports of the Respondents - AAI. The prayers sought in the present petition are extracted below:
"It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:-
i) Pass appropriate writ, Certitiori, direction, order quashing orders of the Respondent authorities dated 12.12.2022 and 14.12.2022 disqualifying the Technical bids and not considering the Financial bid of the petitioners' consortium submitted in respect of eight airports of Bikaner, Gorakhpur, Gwalior, Hindon, Jaisalmer, Kanpur (Chakeri), Prayagraj (Allahabad) & Jamnagar in RFP Tender ld 2022_AAI_131185_1
ii) Pass appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari, direction, order quashing orders of the Respondent authorities dated 14.12.2022 declaring the selected H1 bidders for the eight airports of Bikaner, Gorakhpur, Gwalior, Hindon, Jaisalmer, Kanpur (Chakeri), Prayagraj (Allahabad) & Jamnagar in RFP Tender ld 2022_AAI 131185_1
iii) Pass appropriate writ, mandamus, direction, order directing the respondents to consider the financial bids submitted by the petitioners Consortium in respect of 8 airports - Bikaner, Gorakhpur, Gwalior, Hind on, Jaisalmer, Kanpur (Chakeri), Prayagraj (Allahabad) & Jamnagar ;
iv) Alternatively, Pass appropriate writ, mandamus, direction, order directing the respondents to consider the financial bids submitted by the petitioners Consortium in respect of at least seven airports Gorakhpur, Gwalior, Hindon, Jaisalmer, Kanpur (Chakeri), Prayagraj (Allahabad) & Jamnagar based on their own accepted summated Turnover of Petitioners at Rs 18 Crores ;
v) Pass appropriate writ, direction, order directing the respondents to refrain from giving effect to the selection of bidders subsequent to declaration of H1 including issuance of Letter of Intent to Award(LOIA) Consortium in respect of eight airports- Bikaner, Gorakhpur, Gwalior, Hindon, Jaisalmer, Kanpur (Chakeri), Prayagraj (Allahabad) & Jamnagar.
vi) Alternatively, Pass appropriate writ, direction, order directing the respondents to ask the declared H1 bidder/other bidders to at least match the MAG quoted by the petitioner consortium in respect of the airports in public interest where the Financial Bids submitted by the petitioners consortium is higher than the H1 amount of the Selected bidder.
vii) Pass such other direction/order as is deemed fit and proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case."
4. The background of the case is that, on 6th October, 2022, the Respondent No.2 - Airport Authority of India floated a Request for Proposal ("RFP") seeking bids for Ground Handling Services at 20 AAI Group D Airports, vide Tender ID:2022_AAI_131185_1. The bid submission due date and time was specified as 4th November, 2022. A `bidder', for the purposes of the said tender, could be a single entity or a consortium comprising of a maximum of three entities.
5. The r
Bidders must strictly adhere to stipulated financial eligibility criteria in tenders; altering bids after submission undermines the integrity of the bidding process.
The court held that the petitioner was not required to submit a no-due certificate as they did not meet the definition of an affiliate or concessionaire under the tender documents.
The prescribed eligibility criteria for ground handling services were found to be arbitrary and discriminatory, violating the principles of fair competition and undermining support for micro and smal....
Tender – Terms and conditions of Invitation to Tender are within domain of tenderer/tender making authority and are not open to judicial scrutiny, same being in realm of contract, unless they are arb....
Compliance with tender conditions and eligibility criteria is crucial in technical bid disqualification cases, and the scope of judicial review in such matters is limited.
Tender committees must adhere to established eligibility criteria and cannot alter rules post-evaluation without basis in the tender documents.
The Court held that the eligibility criteria prescribed in the impugned RFPs were arbitrary and discriminatory, and violated the principles of natural justice. The Court also held that the tender con....
Bidders must provide complete and accurate documentation as required by tender specifications, and courts should exercise restraint in reviewing decisions made by tender authorities unless there is c....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.