SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Satish Chandra Sharma, Subramonium Prasad, JJ.
Shilpi Agarwal (Dr.) - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 7570 of 2008
Decided On : 06-01-2023




Promotions in civil service require fulfillment of specific grading benchmarks, with employees having a right to consideration but not entitlement to promotion.

Headnote:(A) Central Health Services Rules, 1996 - Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme - Petition for promotion to the post of Professor was dismissed based on insufficient grading in ACRs - Promotions in civil service require meeting established benchmarks, not merely completion of service time. (Paras 5, 10, 12, 19)

(B) Right of consideration for promotion - Employees have a right to be considered for promotion, but not a right to promotion itself. (Paras 12, 19)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners challenged the dismissal of their applications for promotion to Professor due to not achieving the required 'Very Good' gradings in their ACRs, despite having served the requisite time.

Findings of Court:
The petitioners were not found eligible for promotion as they did not meet the criteria specified under the DACP Scheme regarding grading in ACRs.

Issues: The court addressed the criteria for promotions under DACP Scheme and the requisites for 'Very Good' grading in ACRs.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that promotions depend on fulfilling established criteria, and merely having completed the required service time does not guarantee promotion.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. background of the case (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioners' requests and claims (Para 3 , 11)
3. promotion criteria for associate professors (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9)
4. consideration for eligibility in promotions (Para 10 , 12 , 18)
5. distinction of cited cases (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. The Petitioners before this Court have filed the present writ petition being aggrieved by the common Judgment and Order dated 17.01.2008, in O.A. Nos.1099/2007 and 1103/2007, passed by the Ld. Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Ld. CAT) ("Impugned Order").

2. Vide the Impugned Order, the Ld. CAT had dismissed the Petitioners prayer for quashing/modifying the Order No. A-32012/02/2006-CHS.III dated 21.12.2006 and Order No. 32012/2/2006-CHS.III dated 11.01.2007 along with the consequential promotions. Further, the Petitioners prayer for directing the Respondent No. 1 & 2 therein to promote the Petitioners to the post/grade of Professor in the Central Health Services ("CHS") was also rejected.

3. Before us, the Petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs-

    "(a) set aside judgment and order dated 17.01.2008 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA Nos. 1099/2007 & 1103/07; and

    (b) grant the prayer as made by the petitioners in OA Nos. 1099/2007 & 1103/07.

    (c) pass any such further order or direction as may be deemed fit, proper, necessary and expedient."

4. The undisputed facts of the case reveal that the Petitioners are members of the Central Health Services and are governed under the provisions of Central Health Services Rules, 1996. The Petitioners, upon their selection by the Union Public Services Commission ("UPSC") were appointed in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, in the Grade of Assistant Professor (Specialist Grade II - Junior Scale) of the Teaching Sub-Cadre in the Department of Pathology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi. It has been stated that the next higher post in the relevant hierarchy is Associate Professor, to be filled by direct recruitment, whereas Associate Professor (other than super specialty) is to be filled by promotion on the basis of seniority-cum-fitness without linkage to vacancies. An Assistant Professor with 2 years of regular service in the grade becomes eligible for promotion to the post of Associate Professor. Accordingly, vide Order No. A32012/4/2000 dated 20.02.2000 of the Respondents, Assistant Professors (Specialist Grade II - Junior Scale Teaching Sub-Grade) were promoted as Associate Professors. Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 were promoted to the Post of Associate Professor on 20.04.2001 and 10.01.2002, respectively.

5. The statutory provisions as contained under the Central Health Services Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the `Rules of 1996') provide for promotion to the next higher post, i.e., Specialist Grade-I, Professor. The post of Specialist Grade-I, Professor is to be filled 100% by promotion on non-selection basis without linkage to the vacancies, failing which, by Direct Recruitment. The Rules further provide that an Associate Professor with 6 years of regular service in the grade or an Associate Professor with 8 years combined regular service in the grades of Associate Professor and Assistant Professor is eligible to be promoted as Specialist Grade-I, Professor.

6. The records of the case further reveal that initially the post of Associate Professor was treated to be non-functional. As per Office Memorandum dated 09.10.1999 issued for promotion to the next higher grade, the selection procedure to be followed require at least two "Very Good" gradings in the person's last 5 ACRs. Further, as per the guidelines issued by the DoP&T, the benchmark for promotion to the post of Professor - which is equivalent to Non-Functional Selection Grade, provided that an officer's overall performance should be good with at least two "Very Good" gradings during the last five years, whereas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top