SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

C.HARI SHANKAR
V-Guard Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Registrar of Trademarks – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of trademark registration opposition (Para 1 , 1 , 3)
2. ambiguities in trademark rule 45 (Para 4 , 6 , 7)
3. appellant's attempts to file evidence (Para 8 , 10 , 21)
4. consideration of delay and procedural rights (Para 9 , 14 , 15)
5. setting aside prior decision and directions (Para 25 , 26 , 29)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. This appeal assails the following order dated 30th August 2018, passed by the learned Deputy Registrar of Trademarks in Application No. 2772497 filed by Respondent 2 M/s Livguard Energy Technologies Pvt Ltd. seeking registration of their mark "LIVGUARD ZING" in respect of batteries, invertors and like goods:

    "Proceedings were initiated under Section 21 of the Trade Mark Act, 1999, by the above named opponent to oppose the registration of trade mark applied for by the above named applicant and whereas the Counter Statement was filed by the applicant and the same was served to the opponent on and whereas within the time prescribed under the rules, neither any evidence in support of opposition was filed nor any statement was submitted on behalf of the opponent to the effect that the opponent does not desire to adduce evidence but wants to rely on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top