SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Gaurav Baisoya - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 17612 of 2022
Decided On : 06-01-2023




The court ordered an independent medical review for the petitioner, emphasizing that the findings would be binding, ensuring fairness in the selection process based on medical fitness.

Headnote:(A) Writ Petition - Direction for medical examination - The petitioner sought re-evaluation by an independent board after being declared unfit by multiple medical boards due to discrepancies in medical reports. The Court ordered a specialist board to assess the petitioner and ruled that the findings would be final and binding (Paras 4-10).

(B) Medical Examination - Eligibility - Medical fitness is a prerequisite for selection in the position applied for, and the final determination of fitness rests with the appointed board (Paras 6-10).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner applied for the post of Assistant Commandant in Coast Guard but was deemed unfit due to contradictory medical findings on kidney cysts from different medical boards.

Findings of Court:
The Court directed the establishment of a specialist medical board to reassess the petitioner within three weeks, clarifying that the board's decision on fitness would be conclusive.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should undergo another medical examination due to conflicting reports.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for an independent review to ensure fair assessment of fitness, stating that the new board's findings would be binding on all parties.

Result: Petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. writ petition seeks independent medical examination. (Para 3)
2. contradictory medical reports regarding fitness. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. request for specialist medical board examination. (Para 7)
4. court orders specialist examination with binding report. (Para 8 , 10)
5. petition and application disposed with finality. (Para 9 , 11)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CM APPL.56340/2022 (exemption)

CM APPL.56341/2022 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. The applications are disposed of.

W.P.(C) 17612/2022 & CM APPL.56339/2022 (for interim relief)

3. Vide the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to carry out the medical examination of the petitioner again from an independent board of doctors including the specialist doctors for further completion of the medical examination of the petitioner and to keep the post vacant till the disposal of the present writ petition.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had applied for the post of Assistant Commandant in Coast Guard (Ministry of Defence). Petitioner qualified written test. Subsequently, on 20.08.2022, petitioner appeared before the Special Medical Board for medical examination and was declared unfit on account of "COMPLEX CYSTIC LESION RT KIDNEY". Thereafter, petitioner appeared before Appellate Medical Board on 12.10.2022 and was declared unfit on account of "RT PARAPELVIC CYST". On 03.11.2022, petitioner got examined himself at his own expenses at AIIMS, Delhi and his examination report is as under:

    "Report

    ULTRASOUND ABDOMEN

    Liver: Normal in size and echo-texture. No focal lesion/IHBRD

    Gall Bladder: Normal in wall thickness. No calculus seen. CBD/PV: Normal in calibre

    Pancreas: Normal in bulk and echotexture. MPD not dilated

    Spleen: Normal in size and echotexture. No focal lesion seen.

    Bilateral Kidneys: Normal in size and echotexture. Nu calculus/Hydronephrosis seen. There is a well defined aneichoic lesion in pid-polar region of right kidney measuring 13.8 x 14.2 mm with regular margin with no e/o internal septations/calcification-s/o simple renal cyst

    Urinary Bladder: Normal

    No Free fluid seen

    Impression:

    Right simple renal conical cyst.

    Diagnosis:

    Right simple renal conical cyst."

5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was again declared unfit by the Review Medical Board on account of "A 14X16X15.3mm Bosniak II cyst mid pole right kidney" and the same was conveyed to the petitioner vide e-mail dated 16.12.2022 (Annexure P-1).

6. Further submitted that reports of Special Medical Board dated 20.08.2022, Appellate Medical Board dated 12.10.2022, Review Medical Board dated 16.12.2022 and AIIMS, Delhi dated 03.11.2022 are contradictory to each other.

7. Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, submits that let a specialist Board be constituted and petitioner be examined again.

8. In view of the above, without commenting on the opinion of the aforementioned reports, we hereby direct the In-charge of R&R Hospital, Delhi to constitute a Board of specialist doctors and examine the petitioner within three weeks from today.

9. It is agreed by the petitioner that the report of the R&R Hospital shall be final and binding and it will not be challenged further.

10. We hereby make it clear that in the report of R&R Hospital, Delhi, if the petitioner is found to be fit, he shall be allowed to join the selection process. However, if the report is negative then that will be final and binding upon the parties.

11. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top