SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.HARI SHANKAR
Anubhav Jain – Appellant
Versus
Satish Kumar Jain – Respondent


JUDGMENT

C. Hari Shankar, J. (Oral)

1. This petition has been preferred by Anubhav Jain, one of the Directors in M/s. Jain Shikanji Private Limited ("JSPL", hereinafter) under Sections 571 and 1252 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 ("the Act", hereinafter), seeking cancellation of Certificate No. 2772286 dated 18th June 2021, whereby the device mark was permitted to be registered in favour of Respondent 1. Consequently, rectification of the register of the trademarks, by removing, therefrom, the said registered trademark of Respondent 1 has also been sought.

2. Respondent 1 raised a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the present suit, predicated on Section 124 of the Trademarks Act. By order dated 5th September 2022, this Court directed that the said objection would be taken up and decided in the first instance.

3. I have heard Mr. Gaurav Barathi, learned Counsel for Respondent 1 and Ms. Kangan Roda, learned Counsel for petitioner at length, on the said objection as raised by Respondent 1 and proceed to decide the objection by this order.

4. The circumstances in which the aforesaid objection has been raised by Respondent 1, have, in the first instance, to be note

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top