SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 294

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 
NAVIN CHAWLA, SHALINDER KAUR, JJ.
Alemla Jamir - Appellant 
Versus 
National Investigation Agency - Respondent 
CRL.A.-606 of 2024
Decided on : 13-01-2025  

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Tanveer Ahmad Mir, Mr. Kartik Venu, Md. Imran Ahmad, Mr. Jude Rohit and Mr. Paras Nath Mishra, Advs
For the Respondent: Ms. Shilpa Singh, Spl. PP, NIA with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Vanshaj Tyagi, Advs. and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Inspector and Mr. Pawan Singh Rana.

Bail under the UA(P) Act is an exception; courts must assess prima facie evidence and risks of tampering or flight before granting bail.

Headnote:(A) National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 - Section 21(4) - Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 10, 13, 17, 18, 20, 21 - Bail application - Dismissal of second bail application of appellant for carrying Rs. 72 lakhs allegedly for terrorist activities linked to NSCN(IM) - Appellant claimed funds were for legitimate purposes, but evidence indicated involvement in extortion and terrorism financing - Court emphasized the gravity of charges and potential flight risk due to absconding co-accused. (Paras 1, 4, 54, 79)

(B) Bail - Principles governing - Under UA(P) Act, bail is the exception, not the rule; courts must assess prima facie evidence and potential risks of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. (Paras 60, 64)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was arrested for carrying a large sum of cash linked to a terrorist organization, NSCN(IM), and was accused of raising funds through extortion.

Findings of Court:
The court found sufficient evidence of the appellant's involvement in terrorist activities and dismissed the bail application, citing the severity of the charges and the risk of flight.

Issues: The main issues included the legitimacy of the funds carried by the appellant and the implications of her alleged role in a terrorist organization.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the gravity of the charges and the evidence presented warranted the dismissal of bail, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of the evidence in cases involving terrorism.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

SHALINDER KAUR, J.

1. The present appeal under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act, 2008 has been preferred against the Order dated 31.05.2024, whereby the second bail application of the appellant was dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge - 03 (ASJ), Special Courts (NIA)- New Delhi, Patiala House Courts, Delhi in NIA Case No. 1/2020 titled National Investigation Agency vs. Alemla Jamir & Anr.

BRIEF FACTS

2. The investigation in this case was launched, when on 17.12.2019, the appellant Alemla Jamir (A-1) while travelling from Delhi to Dimapur, Nagaland was intercepted by the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) Security Personnel at the Terminal-1 of the Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGI), New Delhi upon discovery of her carrying Rs. 72 Lakhs in cash, without providing any explanation as to its source. This information was forwarded to the Air Intelligence Unit (AIU) of the Income Tax Department and the appellant was taken in for interrogation, along with her belongings which included the said cash recovered from her.

3. Subsequent thereto, the appellant was questioned by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Investigation) and her statement was duly recorded, wherein she stated that the said cash of Rs. 72 lakhs belongs to Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland (Isaac-Muivah) [NSCN(IM)] and was handed over to her on the directions of Mr. Muivah, General Secretary of NSCN(IM) to be taken to Dimapur, Nagaland.

4. The appellant was then taken for interrogation by the Special Cell on 17.12.2019. Since, it was found that the large amount of money recovered from her was to be used for carrying out operations of an alleged terrorist gang, that is, NSCN(IM) and other terrorist activities in India, a complaint was lodged by the Sub-Inspector Gautam Mallick, on the basis of which an FIR bearing no. 228/2019 was registered on the same day by the Special Cell against the appellant for the offences under Sections 10, 13, 17, 18, 20 & 21 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 [UA(P) Act]. Upon which, the appellant was arrested on 18.12.2019 by the Special Cell. The investigation of the case, vide the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) order no. 11011/63/2019/NIA dated 20.12.2019, was handed over to the NIA and the FIR was re-registered as RC No.26/2019/NIA/DLI.

5. During the course of investigation, the appellant gave a disclosure statement of having collected the cash amount of Rs. 72 lakhs on the directions of Mr. Muivah from his residence at Lodhi Estate, New Delhi, out of which she had to deliver Rs. 70 lakhs to Mrs. Muivah at Dimapur and the rest Rs. 2 lakhs were to be kept by her for personal expenses. The Call Data Records (‘CDR’) of the appellant’s mobile phone, analyzed by the investigating agency, corroborated her location in the house of Mr. Muivah on 16.12.2019.

6. The appellant also disclosed that she was the member of NSCN(IM) and her husband, namely Phungting Shimrang @ P H Shimrang @ Jamis Jamir, was its ex-Army Chief. She also admitted that her husband, along with other individuals, had gone to China in October, 2019 to take assistance from the Chinese Authorities for helping them in ‘Naga Cause’ in their fight against India. The NIA also found that the NSCN(IM) was a terrorist gang with a trained army and sophisticated weaponry, claiming to have enacted its own ‘Naga Army Act’. The NSCN(IM) was accused of running a parallel government under the nomenclature of Government of People’s Republic of Nagalim (GPRN). The objective of GPRN, behind forming a full-fledged Army, was to threaten the unity, integrity,security and sovereignty of India. The organization had also usurped the sovereign Government function of collecting taxes and used to collect various taxes such as Employee Tax, Ration Tax, Vehicle Tax, Royalty, Import and Export / Gate pass Tax etc. 

7. The investigation further revealed that the appellant, in connivance with Masasasong AO (A-2), he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top