Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
Surbhi Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the testamentary matter. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's claims on property ownership. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. civil suit initiated by respondent no. 3. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. witness statements related to the will. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. legal provisions concerning probate. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. description of immovable properties involved. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. discrepancies related to the will. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. contradictions in claims about the will. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. additional contradictions and claims. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 10. suspicion around the will. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 11. suspicious circumstances surrounding the will. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 12. search efforts for the original will. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 13. judicial reluctance to grant probate. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 14. discussion of relevant judicial precedents. (Para 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 15. issues regarding signature validity. (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 16. court's conclusions on the will's validity. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 17. final decision to dismiss the petition. (Para 56) |
| 18. resolution of the matter. (Para 57) |
JUDGMENT :
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J.
1. This testamentary petition
A photocopy of a Will cannot be admitted for probate unless credible evidence shows the original was not intentionally destroyed; significant suspicion surrounding its execution must be satisfactoril....
The propounder must prove the existence and loss of the original Will to obtain Letters of Administration; reliance on a photocopy alone is insufficient.
The propounder of a Will must satisfactorily dispel all suspicious circumstances regarding its validity, particularly when substantial benefits accrue to them, or the Will may be deemed invalid.
The court emphasized that the burden of proof lies on the propounder of a Will, especially when suspicious circumstances exist, necessitating clear evidence of its validity.
Secondary evidence – Neither mere admission of a document in evidence amounts to its proof nor mere making of an exhibit of a document dispense with its proof, which is otherwise required to be done ....
The need to remove all legitimate suspicions before a document can be accepted as the last will of the testator.
The court upheld the validity of a registered Will, ruling that the burden of proof for allegations of forgery lies with the defendants, which they failed to meet.
Important Point : A will can be proved through secondary evidence if the original is lost, and Letters of Administration can be granted when no executor is appointed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
