SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 965

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AMIT MAHAJAN
Sanjeev Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Ritu Gupta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Petitioner in person

Table of Content
1. case background and initial proceedings (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's reasoning and evaluation (Para 5 , 6 , 18 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 27 , 31 , 33 , 34)
3. petitioner's allegations and arguments (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. legal standards under section 340 of crpc (Para 19 , 20 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 32)
5. final order and dismissal of the petition (Para 35 , 36)

JUDGMENT :

AMIT MAHAJAN, J.

1. The present petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘CrPC’) challenging the order dated 28.02.2018 (hereafter ‘impugned order dated 28.02.2018’), passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (‘ASJ’), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in Criminal Appeal No. 58/2017.

2. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 25.08.2017 (hereafter ‘impugned order dated 25.08.2017’), in Case No.4756/2017, whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (‘MM’), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi dismissed the petitioner’s application under Section 340 of the CrPC read with Section 195 of the CrPC.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent and the petitioner were married i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top